ANALISA FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI PERILAKU CYBERLOAFING PADA PEGAWAI NEGERI DINAS PEKERJAAN UMUM KOTA PALEMBANG

Dwi Hurriyati, Rina Oktaviana

Abstract


Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaruh faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi perilaku cyberloafing pada Pegawai Negeri Dinas Pekerjaan Umum Kota Palembang. Teknik pengambilan sampel dalam penelitian ini menggunakan teknik simple random sampling dan jumlah sampel dalam penelitian sebanyak 400 pegawai Negeri Dinas Pekerjaan Umum Kota Palembang. Penelitian menggunakan uji analisis regersi berganda. Hasil penelitian ini yaitu terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan antara jenis kelamin, usia, masa kerja, individu, organisasi dan situasi terhadap perilaku cyberloafing, dengan taraf signifikan sebesar 0.000 atau P < 0.05. Adapun R-square dari semua variabel yang telah diuji sebesar 0.962 atau 96.2%. Artinya proporsi varians dari perilaku cyberloafing yang dijelaskan oleh semua independen variabel sebesar 96.2%. Dari  keenam independen variabel yang diujikan semuanya mempengaruhi secara signifikan terhadap perilaku cyberloafing pada Pegawai Negeri Dinas Pekerjaan Umum dengan nilai sig dibawah 0.05. Dan masing-masing independen variabel memberikan sumbangan antara lain jenis kelamin sebesar 1.0%, usia sebesar 10%, masa kerja 21%, individu sebesar 59,3%, organisasi sebesar 82.4% dan situasi sebesar 36.6% terhadap perilaku cyberloafing


Keywords


Perilaku Cyberloafing, individu, organisasi, situasi.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abidin, R. 2014. The relationship of cyberloafing behavior with big five persnoality traits. Austria Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 8(12), 61-66.

Askew, Kevin Landon, "The Relationship Between Cyberloafing and Task Performance and an Examination of the Theory of Planned Behavior as a Model of Cyberloafing" (2012). Graduate Theses and Dissertations.

Blanchard, A. L., & Henle, C. A. (2008). Correlates of different forms of cyberloafing: The role of norms and external locus of control. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1067–1084.

Block, W. 2001.â€Cyberslacking, Business Ethics and Managerial Economics.†Journal of Business Ethics

Henle, C. A and Blanchard, A. L. 2008. “The Interaction of Work Stressor and Organizational Sanctions on Cyberloafingâ€. Journal of Managerial Issues

LaRose,R., (2010). Social networking: Addictive, compulsive, problematic, or just another media habit.In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A networked self: Identity, community, and cultureon social network sites (pp. 59-81). NY: Routledge.

Lee O, Lim, KH, Wong WM (2005) Why employees do non-work-related computing: an exploratory investigation through multiple theoretical perspectives. In: Proceeding of the 38th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, pp 185c

Lim, V. K. G. 2002. “The IT Way of Loafing on The Job: Cyberloafing, Neutralizing and Organizational Justice. “Journal of Organizational Behaviour†23; 675-694.

Lim, V.K.G. & Chen, D.J.Q. (2009). Impact of Cyberloafing on Affect, Work depletion, Facilitation and Engagement. Conference Paper SIOP, 1-20.

Lim, Vivien K.G. and Chen, Don J.Q. (2008), Singapore study supports workplace‘cyerloafing’,://www.misasia.com/news/articles/singaporestudy support-workplace-cyberloafing, diakses pada 2 Februari 2010.

Ozler, D.R. dan Polay, G. 2012. Cyberloafing phenomenon in organizations :determinants and impact. International Journal of eBusiness and eGoverment Studies, 4(2), 1-15.

Penney, L.M. & Spector, P.E. 2005. Narcissim and counterproductive work behavior : Do bigger egos mean bigger problems?International Journal of Selection and Assesment,10, 126-134.

Robbins, Stephen P. 2004. Perilaku Organisasi. Jakarta: PT.Indeks Kelompok Gramedia.

Sekaran, Uma. 2003. Research Methodhs for Business.John Willey & Sons Inc. United States of America.

Stanton, J.M. (2002). Web addict or happy employee ? Communications of the ACM, 45(1), 55-59.

Vitak, J., Crouse, J., & LaRose, R. (2011). Personal internet use at work: Understanding cyberslacking. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1751-1759.

Weatherbee, T.G. (2010). Counterproductive use of technology at work: Information & communications technologies and cyberdeviancy. Humans