Normative Juridical to Analyze and Observe Castrated Sanction Implementation for Sexual Violence Executor Toward Underage Child in Indonesia Based on Acts Number 17 Year 2016 and its Comparison in Australia

Abstract

At the present, the community has been familiar with pedophile terms after a sexual insulting case toward underage child was emerged. Sexual violence over child usually an executor is adults who their scopes close to victim either family surrounding or the people surrounding that child live. To overcome this sexual violence act, government has determined Acts Number 17 Year 2016 concerning Government Regulation Decision on Acts Replacement Number 17 Year 2016 concerning Second Alteration on Acts Number 23 Year 2002 concerning Child Protection become Acts. And Australia’s Constitution Acts, forming federal government system where the power has divided to be federal government and state government, has legitimated as a part of British Act of Parliament 9the commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900, [Imp] clause 9) in UU form on July 9, 1900. This research has purposed to know castrated sanction implementation based on Acts Number 17 Year 2016 and castrated sanction implementation in Australia, and to know castrated sanction difference and similarity for sexual violence executor toward a child based on Acts Number 17 Year 2016 with be valid Law in Australia. This research has analysis descriptive nature to illustrate and explain about implementation concerning castrated sanction both in Indonesia and Australia.  Then, approach method on this mini thesis use normative juridical to analyze and observe castrated sanction implementation for sexual violence executor toward underage child in Indonesia based on Acts Number 17 Year 2016 and its comparison in Australia. A research result that is basically it is based on merely retaliation principle, on other word that reasons to be base a castrated pronouncement of sentence, government must be reanalyzed about castrated sentence for sexual crime executor because it is contradicted with medicine ethic code that can to damage human organ, in order that give justice sense in the same way for either victim or executor