Developing Research Ethics In Interculture Communication Studies

Atwar Bajari

Abstract


Intercultural communication research does in interaction process between researcher and society (ethnic, community, and nation) has exclusivity or uniqueness of culture. The researcher carries cultural background and research mission in one hand, meanwhile in the other hand, community or society have a different culture and information that needed by the researcher. Gudykunst and Ting-Toomey have concluded that meeting among people with different culture require complete understanding, especially in interculture perception that facilitated interaction between researcher and community. In this case, the researcher should attempt to hold norms, rule and trust principles during field research. These main principles called ethics of research. The paper tries to explain, firstly, attention to ethics in intercultural communication research. Secondly, developing responsible cultural communication research to agreed the research ethics. The formulations that can be submitted through this paper are as follows: firstly, research ethics in communication studies and intercultural communication need to be understood by the researchers. It is even has to comply with formula of research ethics in qualitative and quantitative research. Each paradigm has a different perspective on scientific truths and differences in the interests of the paradigm in conducting research. Secondly, principles such as respect for human dignity, privacy and confidentiality, justice and inclusiveness, and the benefits and disadvantages of human research, should be used as a benchmark for developing intercultural communication research ethics.

Keywords


research ethics, culture, intercultural communication, quantitative research, and qualitative research

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bacon and Oleson, Ethical Issues in Conducting Research, 2005, source http://kttm.hoasen.edu.vn/sites/default/files/2011/12/22/research_ethics_and_intergrity_-_issues_for_vn_-_lan_anh.pdf

Bajari, Atwar, (2010), AnakJalanan, DinamikaKomunikasidanPerilakuSosialAnakMenyimpang, Bandung: Humaniora.

Bajari, Atwar, (2012) MetodePenelitianKomunikasi, Prosedur, TrendanEtika, Bandung: Simbiosa.

Baldwin, John R., Model of Intercultural Communication, Ilinois: School of Communication, Ilinois State University, May, 21, 2013, source: http://my.ilstu.edu/~jrbaldw/372/Models.htm

Barke, Richard, Balancing Uncertain Risks and Benefits in Human Subjects Research, Atalanta: School of Public Policy Georgia Institute of Technology, 2007.

Dimyati, Idi, (2017), KonsepDiridanPerilakuKomunikasiPetugasKesehatanpadaMasyarkatBaduy, StudiFenomenologi, Disertasi, Bandung: FikomUnpad.

Geertz, Clifford, (1984), The Interpretation of Culture, New York: Basic Books, Inc., Publisher.

Horton, Paul B., dan Chester L. Hunt, (1989), Sosiologi, Jakarta: Erlangga.

Martin, J. (2002). Organizational Culture: Mapping the Terrain. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Martin, J., & Frost, P. J. (1996). “The organizational culture war games: A struggle for intel- lectual dominance.†In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of Organization Studies (pp. 599–621). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Martin, J., &Meyerson, D. (1988).“Organizational cultures and the denial, channeling and acknowledgment of ambiguity.â€In L. Pondy, R. Boland, & H. Thomas (Eds.), Managing Ambiguity and Change. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Martin, J., Frost, P. J., & O’Neill, O. A. (2006). “Organizational culture: Beyond struggles for intel- lectual dominance.†In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. Lawrence, & W. Nord (Eds.), The Handbook of Organization Studies (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Mulyana, Deddy, (1990), KomunikasiAntarBudaya, Bandung: RemadjaRosdaKarya,

Muslim, “EtikadanPendekatanPenelitiandalamFilsafatIlmuKomunikasi (SebuahTinjauanKonseptualdanPraktikal,†JurnalKomunikologi Vol. 4 No. 2, September 2007, http://digilib.esaunggul.ac.id/public/UEU-Journal-4556-Muslim.pdf

Sembiring, Sri Alem. 2002. RefleksiMetodologis: PerjalananPenelitianMenghasilkanEtnografi. Terarsipdalam digital library Universitas Sumatera Utara.

Smerek, Ryan, Cultural Perspectives of Academia: Toward a Model of Cultural Complexity, dalam Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, C Springer Science and Business Media, 2010. Sumber: http://www.sesp.northwestern.edu/docs/publications/158316171651f81e5484492.pdf

SRDC/SRDA, Our Code of Practice, Source: http://www.srdc.org/about-us/our-code-of-practice.aspx

TCPS2, Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans, Canada: TCPS, 2014. Gregory, I. (2003) Ethics in Research. London: Continuum. Oliver, P. (2003) The Student’s Guide to Research Ethics. Maidenhead: Open University Press

Yurisa, Wella, (2008), EtikaPenelitianKesehatan, Pekanbaru, Faculty of Medicine – University of Riau.

http://www.sagepub.com/ upm-data/26094_3.pdf, downloaded at June, 8, 2017.

https://spp.gatech.edu/publications/ pubFile/362., downloaded at June, 8, 2017




 Â